Is it true that “It costs just as much to make it ugly”?
Just ask Target. Or Alessi. Or Chrysler. Affordable design is a differentiator in so many aspects of our lives. In fact, we pretty much expect things to be well designed….that is, until they aren’t.
Think about it for a moment: you can go to a store or shop online and purchase a household item or article of clothing knowing that it is attractively designed, reasonably priced, and of acceptable quality.
Yet, when you go to work there’s very good chance that the building and its interior hasn’t changed one bit since it was first built.
Essentially, you may be working in an obsolete environment. One designed for typewriters and drafting tables, not computers and collaboration.
And, if your company is like most others, you and your colleagues represent up to 70% of the fixed cost of the business. Meanwhile, the cost for the space you occupy costs your employer around 5% of fixed costs.
What this means is that you quite possibly may be suffering and adapting to an obsolete space, while becoming less and less efficient, because a relatively small amount of money isn’t spent to improve your working conditions.
I was visiting T2, a well-established Indianapolis tech company a week ago, and they had just moved into new headquarters. The building interior is beautifully designed and fitted out. Not just the lobby, mind you, but the entire space. In talking with Irena Goloschokin, a senior executive, she expressed how much everyone loved coming to work (of course, two craft beers on tap is a pretty nice inducement).
But well beyond the lunchroom amenities, the space was purpose-designed to meet the specific needs of each type of employee, from programmers to web developers, to hardware developers to marketing, customer service and management.
Here’s just one small example of how they made space that fit each type of task: software developers need privacy. They are normally shoved into cubicles away from windows and other people. But not here. Each developer gets a private “office” (about the same footprint as a cubicle but much nicer) that has a large exterior window, work surfaces designed for what they do (like a whiteboard wall directly behind their desk, so they can swivel and whiteboard ideas). And the glass door is on a track so they can easily slide it open or closed. Lighting is controlled in each individual office.
The result: developers are delighted. They work more productively than before, stay longer, interact with teammates.
So, I asked Irena about the cost. They hired a design firm, Schott Design, with lead designer Jessica Enright, and working together Schott and T2 used some of the existing furniture from their former space, and artfully incorporated it with the new furniture.
But Irena looked beyond the cost savings, and said that the investment had already paid dividends in improved engagement, higher productivity and overall employee satisfaction.
(By the way, we had this discussion at 7p over a glass of beer, and there were still plenty of people at work. Talk about an engaged workforce!)
The list of innovations could go on, but the point is that the cost was essentially the same as if they had done a standard issue design that wouldn’t have been purposefully thought out to meet the needs of employees, today and tomorrow.
-Tom Miller










